Sweet Smell of Success

Sweet Smell of Success
Directed by Alexander Mackendrick
Starring Burt Lancaster, Tony Curtis

The dark, seedy world of 1950s America has provided an array of classic noir films renowned for quick talking, sharply dressed characters and corrupt, dazzling cities full of people wanting to make money by any means necessary. This atmospheric genre is epitomised in Sweet Smell of Success as it examines the dark side of the journalist and the power they have to manipulate people.

Sweet Smell of Success centres on two characters in differing positions of power: J.J. Hunsecker, an influential national columnist, and Sidney Falco, a publicist willing to do anything to make money, including Hunsecker’s dirty work.

Co-written by Ernest Lehman, who went on to write the screenplay for West Side Story and The Sound of Music, the film is filled with witty dialogue and sharp interactions creating humour as well as drama. Having worked as a journalist and a publicist before turning to screenwriting, Lehman’s account of the greed and cut-throat nature of journalism gives the audience a different perspective of the profession. The journalist is not a ‘public watchdog,’ uncovering the truth for the good of the people.

Instead, we are given an insight into the ruthlessness of show business and the worth of being mentioned in a national newspaper column. The need for actors and singers to get noticed by national publications creates the environment for publicists like Falco to do whatever it takes to fulfil promises that can’t be guaranteed.

Although the film was a Box Office disaster, critics have praised the film’s superb camera work and New York vernacular. In 2002 the musical version of the film was created and Time ranked Sweet Smell of Success as one of the “All-Time 100 Movies,” marking it as one of the most significant journalist genre films of the 20th century.

The Killing Fields

The Killing Fields
Directed by Roland Joffé
Starring Sam Waterston, John Malkovich, Haing S. Ngor

Academy Award winning director Francis Ford Coppola said in 1979 that “quality and integrity” are the two things that make a great movie. Five years later, Roland Joffé’s directorial debut, The Killing Fields, epitomised those two characteristics with 141 minutes of emotional, powerful and awe-inspiring film.

The story of Sidney Schanberg and Dith Pran is one of friendship amidst the harsh and terrifying realities of the war in Cambodia during the 1970s. Through the uncensored images of dead bodies and executions the audience is delivered a realistic view of life for, not just a journalist, but also a native in Cambodia at the time of the Vietnam War.

Pat Golden’s casting of Haing S. Ngor, a survivor of the Khmer Rouge and its labour camps, as Pran was a great success, allowing the debut actor to pick up the Oscar for Best Supporting Actor – the first male Asian actor to do so.

The Killing Fields gives an insight into the risk taken by war reporters every day, bringing to life the efforts of many journalists who have risked their lives in order to bring people the news from across the world. But the overriding theme is one of friendship between two men who would stand by each other even in the face of death.

Critically acclaimed, the film won three Oscars, with a further four nominations and 26 other awards from several institutions.

Watching this film, it is unsurprising to see why it has been rated as one of the 'greatest tearjerkers' of all time, grasping a sense of happiness, relief and raw emotion through the reuniting of Sidney and Pran in the final scene, as John Lennon's 'Imagine' plays over the top. A sensational film that provides everything an audience wants. A true masterpiece.

Good Night, and Good Luck

Good Night, and Good Luck
Directed by George Clooney
Starring George Clooney, David Strathairn, Robert Downey Jr.

“We will not walk in fear, one of another” – the hard-hitting words of Edward R. Murrow who used television to bring down Senator Joseph McCarthy in the 1950’s. Good Night, and Good Luck accurately captures Murrow’s attempts to stop McCarthy, integrating historical footage of McCarthy and the trial of Annie Lee Moss which adds to the realism.

The film, released in 2005, was George Clooney’s second feature film as director. Clooney’s views on Darfur made the headlines a year after the film was released and he has backed Barack Obama’s presidential campaigns, indicating his strong political opinions and possible motive for wanting to re-tell the story of Murrow. The film was nominated for six Oscars and ranked 89^th on the list of highest grossing films of 2005.

Although the film covers the story of Murrow in immense detail, it is slow paced and at times appears static. The story is interesting and one worth telling, bringing to attention the issues of the 1950’s and the worry over Communism within the American government at the time, as well as the way Murrow invented television as a powerful medium. But in making sure the film is accurate it loses its appeal to a wider audience and serves only as a cinematic account of this monumental era in recent American history.

There is no doubting the quality of stylistic features used in Good Night, and Good Luck. Its use of close-ups and shadowed lighting capture the controversial nature and pressure Murrow and the men behind See it Now were under. Fifty years on from See it Now, the film acts as an interesting insight into the actions of one television journalist who affected the lives of many Americans for the better.

All the President's Men

All the President’s Men
Directed by Alan J. Pakula
Starring Dustin Hoffman, Robert Redford

On the face of it, a story about two journalists working for the Washington Post may seem somewhat dull. However, a story about the discovery of one of America’s biggest political scandals makes for a thrilling and insightful look into the workings of the journalists who uncovered the truth.

The story of Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein is told to perfection by All the President’s Men and displays the cover up of President Nixon to its full extent. Although the film is centred around the Watergate scandal, it also shows the inner workings of American newspapers in the 1970’s. Cramped office floors, heavily debated editorial meetings and the intense pursuit of leads all allow the story to come to life.

Throughout, the theme of government cover up is apparent, matched by the lack of belief in the story’s credibility by the Washington Post editors. The appearance of Deep Throat, an unnamed source at the time, later revealed to be FBI Associate Director Mark Felt, marked speculation over his identity for decades to come and gave life to one of the most famous anonymous sources in American history.

The film was a success in 1976, landing fourth spot on the highest grossing films of that year behind Rocky, To Fly! and A Star is Born. It also won four Oscars, including Best Supporting Actor, and was nominated for a further four awards.

Take away the factual element of the story and you have a stand-alone detective film that leaves the audience attempting to uncover the truth as they watch. Although classed as a political thriller, it makes a case for a whole new genre based on the workings of a journalist. Whether you know the story of Watergate or not, it’s a must watch.

The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet's Nest

Hello again. As with all my endeavours, I have returned after a long leave of absence which I have no reason for taking. I would present you with the excuse that I have been busy but everyone knows students have far too much free time on their hands.

The reason for returning isn't simply random, nor is it because I thought to myself 'I must write something just to make my blogs seem active'. Luckily, as I near the end of my university life, one of my Journalism modules requires me to watch a film and review it every week. So I thought I'd use those to reinvigorate this blog, that never really got into a flow of things.

There will be a reoccurring theme of journalists within these reviews, which you would expect from a module titled 'Journalists on the Screen'. So I hope you enjoy, maybe it'll give you some inspiration to watch some of these films that you might normally ignore.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest
Directed by Daniel Alfredson

As with all film trilogies, the trick to a successful final chapter is to encompass everything from the first two films and tie the story into a securely fastened knot, leaving the audience happy to have taken their time to watch all three instalments. Add in the fact that the film is an adaptation and you have even more expectation to do the novel justice. Thankfully, fans of the books and films will be pleased with the way this dark, gritty drama comes to a climax, allowing for a satisfying conclusion to the story of Lisbeth Salander’s troubled life.

Having directed The Girl Who Played with Fire, his first worldwide feature film release, Daniel Alfredson follows up its success with the final adaptation of Stieg Larsson’s series of novels. However, Box Office figures tell a story – The Girl Who Kicked the Hornet’s Nest turned over £15 million less than The Girl Who Played with Fire and a staggering £38 million less than the first in the trilogy, The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

Unlike in the first two films, the third follows the work of the journalists as they attempt to uncover the illegal activities of a secret organisation within the Swedish government. In following the journalists of Millennium magazine, led by editor Mikael Blomkvist, the film displays thought provoking theories of government corruption, as well as a unique look at the police and journalists working together.

Once you get past the TV production feel and the Swedish subtitles you can appreciate the hard hitting storyline that neatly ties up the trilogy, making it a must watch for those who have seen the first two films.

The Fighter packs a serious punch

I have finally got round to writing another blog having been kept busy with uni these past few months. Apologies to those who have enjoyed the last few, I hope to be blogging more frequently throughout the summer. I have decided to return with a review of 'The Fighter', which I was tempted to see in the cinema when it was released in 2010 but decided to wait for a chance to watch it when it came out on DVD or TV. Bare with me as I take myself back to a month or two a go when I finally got a chance to watch it.

The film is based on the real lives of two boxing half-brothers, one of whom is retired (Christian Bale), the other younger brother hoping to breakthrough into the boxing elite (Mark Wahlberg). Dicky Eklund was known for beating boxing legend Sugar Ray Leonard and is the hero of his hometown - however, now a drug addict, Dicky tries to re-live his glory days through his brother's career, training him to fight. Micky Ward is a failing boxer who has become known as a stepping stone for up-and-coming boxers to make the step up to the next level.

It's a brilliant story about an underdog who has to fight his family and all he knows in order to gain success. What makes the film is Christian Bale's unbelievable performance as Dicky Eklund. His dedication to the role is clear through his rough appearance, and it is obvious he has studied the real life personality of Dicky meticulously from the piece of archive footage shown at the end of the film. It is truly one of the best representations of a real life character you are ever likely to see.

The rest of the cast are also very good and unlike many sports films the sporting action comes across as realistic and not over dramatic. If you are female and hoping to watch this purely because you find Bale attractive you will be let down, but us men get to see a glimpse of the rather sexy red-headed Amy Adams in her underwear during the film.

Superficial reasons for watching 'The Fighter' aside, I fully recommend watching this hard hitting drama that tackles so much more than boxing. Without a doubt the best film I have seen so far this year.

The Grey - not so dull

After internet problems and general laziness, this blog is finally here. A couple of weeks ago I took my first trip to the cinema since watching the final installment of the Harry Potter series over the Summer. For me there has to be an extremely good reason to fork out money for the cinema, and whilst I actually had free tickets, it was Liam Neeson's appearance in another epic role that warranted a visit.

Based on Ghost Walker, a short story by Ian MacKenzie Jeffers, The Grey is set in the harsh winter climate of Alaska. Liam Neeson is forced to lead a men of oil workers in a dangerous battle against a pack of wolves following a plane crash in the middle of the Alaskan mountains. The film has quite heavy undertones as it portrays the mental struggle these men face, combining themes of death and suicide, as well as love and survival.

If you're a fan of Liam Neeson you'll love his performance. He delivers some brilliant lines and plays the 'lone wolf' character to perfection. The other characters are average, although the antagonist for the majority of the film, played by Frank Grillo, stands out above the rest.

My favourite aspect to the film was the cinematography. Set in the mountains the backdrops were picturesque and really gave you a sense of being in the wilderness, whilst the camera work was incredible. As a film and TV student I fully appreciated the technical side to the film which added to my enjoyment, especially seeing it on the big screen.

On the downside, the film started to drag around the midpoint after an entertaining opening which meant you started to lose focus from the themes being portrayed and, in some scenes, became a little bored. Whilst I didn't think the ending was that bad, some might be a little cheated by the abrupt end - especially those who stayed to watch the 5 second added clip that was shown after the credits.

I would highly recommend this film if you are Liam Neeson fan, and even if you're not, it's more than definitely worth a watch. Thank you cinema, see you in another 6 months.